<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>storage &#8211; Rafael Bernard Araujo</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rafael.bernard-araujo.com/tag/storage/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rafael.bernard-araujo.com</link>
	<description>desenvolvendo... while(!success){  try(); }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2023 19:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>pt-BR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21941730</site>	<item>
		<title>Tropeçando 73</title>
		<link>https://rafael.bernard-araujo.com/tropecando-73.php</link>
					<comments>https://rafael.bernard-araujo.com/tropecando-73.php#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rafael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Tropeçando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banco de dados]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PostGreSQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rafael.bernard-araujo.com/?p=1194</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tables and indexes vs. HDD and SSD Although in the future most database servers (particularly those handling OLTP-like workloads) will use a flash-based storage, we’re not there yet – flash storage is still considerably more expensive than traditional hard drives, and so many systems use a mix of SSD and HDD drives. pgBackRest 1.0 Released [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20161109044138/http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/tables-and-indexes-vs-hdd-and-ssd/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tables and indexes vs. HDD and SSD</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Although in the future most database servers (particularly those handling OLTP-like workloads) will use a flash-based storage, we’re not there yet – flash storage is still considerably more expensive than traditional hard drives, and so many systems use a mix of SSD and HDD drives.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1661/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">pgBackRest 1.0 Released</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The first stable of release of pgBackRest introduces a new, more capable repository format, simpler configuration, and comprehensive support for backup and restore of symlinked directories and files.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://imasters.com.br/desenvolvimento/visualizacao-de-postgres-plan-query/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Visualização de Postgres Plan Query</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Uma ferramenta que pode fazer planos (EXPLAIN) simples de entender e visualmente agradável.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://bonesmoses.org/2016/05/20/pg-phriday-trusty-table-tiers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">PG Phriday: Trusty Table Tiers</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Well, there is another way to do partitioning that’s almost never mentioned. The idea is to actually utilize the base table as a storage target, and in lieu of triggers, schedule data movement during low-volume time periods. The primary benefit to this is that there’s no more trigger overhead.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://leopard.in.ua/2016/09/20/safe-and-unsafe-operations-postgresql" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Safe and unsafe operations for high volume PostgreSQL</a></p>
<blockquote><p>If I run a bad command, it can lock out updates to a table for a long time. For example, if I create a new index on table, I cannot create new record in this table while that index is building. Anyone who tries to make a record in this table will block, and possibly time out, causing a partial outage. In general, I am ok with database operations taking a long time. However, any operation that locks a table for updates for more than a few seconds means downtime for me.</p>
<p>I decided to make a list of an operations, which can be done safe (without downtime) and usafe.</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://rafael.bernard-araujo.com/tropecando-73.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1194</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
